Friday, August 15, 2008

A short blast with the BMW 320i and the Hyundai Genesis Article, too...




Oh, by the way, our Genesis article is up... sadly... that was a very short test (don't know if you can call a drive of less than ten kilometers a "test")... sadly because it was an interesting car... lots of power, good suspension (great for a Korean...) and lots of toys... but my last test, a BMW X6, which should go up next week... was even shorter in terms of kilometers driven... but in terms of how much driving we were allowed to do, it was a world of difference.

The Genesis is an absolute revelation for a Korean car. The quality, the build and the technology (brand new chassis, suspension, etcetera...) and the confidence are something you would never expect... even if you're familiar with the new and improved Hyundai models already roaming our streets. even better, Kelley Blue Book and other authorities are giving it a big thumbs-up. This looks like it'll be a home-run for Hyundai... if the public is willing to give it a chance. Still, it's no BMW... it's just nowhere near as good a driver's car as the BMW 5-series... or even the X6.

Of course, this entry isn't about either car. It's about the car we took up north to the test and that I drove back down to Manila. The BMW 320i.

Lito German, the ever-loving Marketing guy from BMW, set us up with various BMW models to take to the X6 test up on the racetrack at Subic. Brent Co (of http://www.autoindustriya.com ) and I drove up in the middle of the night in blinding rain at a steady 120-140 km/h. The car felt utterly stable, but I wasn't so sure of the speeds Brent was driving at. Of course, being a sigurista... I called dibs on the driver's seat for the drive back.

And you know what? I can understand how he got up to those speeds... the 320i is not just stable... it's very stable. And, as most European cars are, it's build with highway legs like Claudia Schiffer... they go on and on and on... I was doing a lazy 160 km/h at just 3000 rpms in 6th gear on the SCTEX on the way home... Brent, my wife and my kid sleeping like babies. Impressive. My Japanese motor might accelerate faster, but I wish it were this quiet at just 100 km/h. The 6-speed automatic and perfect drivin position made long-distance motoring absolutely relaxing.

Despite not having the new BMW Navigation system, the trip was uneventful and easy. The SCTEX has really cut time off of the Manila to Subic trip. While our trip to Subic was beset by flash floods on EDSA and torrential rain, the trip home was mostly dry with a smattering of light drizzle. It took us just two hours to leg it back to Manila, despite catching rush hour traffic around Quezon Avenue and slowing to 120 km/h every time I thought I saw a patrol vehicle on the side of the road.

And the 320i impressed on the racetrack, too. Handled very well, punched out of corners easily, and slithered through slaloms and chicanes with ease. Great composure. There's some push when you exceed the tire's limits, but then, that's easy to cure. In fact, I'd say this feels more organic than the MX-5 we drove a while back... and less buzzy, strangely.

Great seats, nice interior, decent space... this car ticks all the right boxes. While this variant may not have all the bells and whistles, I don't really mind... I like my cars simple. And while the steering may not have the "right-now" handling immediacy of the C-Class we tested a while back, the chassis balance and steering feel are still leagues better.

The only niggles with the 320i are the side mirrors, whose concave wingtips can give you headaches, and the run-flats, which make the ride over gravel parking lots and broken pavement terrible. Otherwise, I could imagine living with one of these cars for the rest of my life.

Only, make mine a manual.

Sunday, July 13, 2008

Hyundai Veracruz versus Mazda CX-9



Well, this was a fun two tests... the CX-9 and Veracruz are both fine automobiles, but obviously, for us motorheads... there's only one thing that matters... excitement. And the Veracruz just doesn't have any. But the backseat of the Veracruz is a fine place to be if you're taking a long road trip out and can afford a driver.

The CX-9 is fantastic, though... the sound, the power, the driver-oriented stance. It doesn't give up much (if anything) in the way of comfort to achieve its sportiness. Handling is, like the BMW X5, very muscle-car-ish... except that the X5's AWD system allows for a little more tail-happiness than the CX-9, which acts more like a front-driver most of the time. The CX-7 would probably be a better drive, but, sadly, we don't get that here. Too bad, a CX-7 with a 2.0 CRDi would sell like hotcakes.

Sunday, February 17, 2008

Doldrums Doldrums Doldrums

Getz article is stalled by the lack of hard testing data on a fresh Getz CRDi. I wonder if HARI (Hyundai's marketing arm in the Philippines) actually cares that their test units might be driving customers away. On a related note: I'm getting sick of testing the same old stuff... I want new cars to test! Wouldn't say no to another Focus test-drive.

The Hyundai Getz was a fine daily driver, but the suspension systems on modern Hyundais are still a step behind the best of the rest. There are Japanese cars with terrible suspension set-ups, too (*cough* Toyota *cough*) but they still feel much more refined than the Hyundai/Kias (at least in this aspect).


Suzuki Alto Article now up

We had a blast with the Suzuki Alto, too. A great illustration of the way weight affects the speed of a car. With only 47 ponies and a dry weight of about 750 kilos, the Alto loses about 3-4 seconds against the clock (to 100 km/h) per passenger. Theoretically, it would go much faster than the 17-18 seconds we got if a monkey were driving it. We're still looking for a monkey.

The Alto is a truly horrid car. Indian build quality, golf-cart tires, a thrashy engine... but the V10-like wail of the three cylinder engine (Imagine a Lamborghini Gallardo, volume at "2" instead of "11"), the lack of nannying understeer (never has 60 km/h felt so... entertaining...) and the wheels-at-the-corner feeling of the tiny little thing made it a blast to drive. Too bad there's nothing else to recommend it for purchase.

Tuesday, January 22, 2008

Tucson Article up!



Agh. I'm still getting used to working on this Eee PC, so my GIMP-work is a little shoddy... oh well... it's done, it's up, and I'm happy.

As I've said previously, it's not the best CUV out there, but it was a fun little thing, and I'm sad to see it go... especially since this means I'm stuck rowing my own gears again... in traffic... oh joy... but hope looms on the horizon... A test drive of the Santa Fe and Starex loom... as well as one for the CR-V... but then, I'd really like to sink my teeth into a car again. Something nice and zippy...

Saturday, January 19, 2008

Hyundai Tucson

I'm currently finishing up an article on the Hyundai Tucson... I didn't expect it to be much of a test-drive... in fact, aside from the diesel engine, I couldn't think of a single reason for anyone to buy the Tucson... but man, does it handle sweetly...

Not many cars nowadays will talk to you about what's happening at the wheels, and not many will give you the adjustability that keen drivers look for in a motorcar... so it's very refreshing to find a compact SUV with a sharp turn-in... and even more refreshing to find one that you can actually trail-brake or throttle-lift into oversteer... quite an entertaining little beast... too bad the interior screams "Corolla" and the diesel in this car is the most gutless of Hyundai's CRDis... 13.8 seconds to 100 km/h... and only when it's cold out... this is a car screaming for a better transmission, an intercooler, and about thirty more horses.

Me? I'd love to have one... buy it? No thanks.

Saturday, January 5, 2008

New Year, More Cars

It's been a slow Christmas, dental operation, sensor issues with my red rocket and the general blahness of the season... but now that the new year has started, I'm finally getting into the swing of things. I'll be posting an article on the Kia Carens this Monday, and I'll be doing test drives of the Kia Spectra and the Hyundai Tucson this month.

I'm also hoping to sink my teeth into a Chery QQ, as well as do some photography and a short review of the Alto.

Ahhh.. ain't life grand?

Wednesday, December 12, 2007

Some updates from Bigbigcar



Have a lot of others on already... just haven't had time to update this Blog.





I really had a blast doing the Focus article... it was long overdue, as I had two features on the TDCi pending and I wrote them into one article... it would be unseemly to post three Focus articles at once, so the other two are probably going to be uploaded "stealth" style... without being reflected on the main page.

Things are going slowly right now... haven't done a test-drive in two weeks and I'm getting pretty antsy... well... maybe next week we'll do one or two little things... ;)

Tuesday, October 23, 2007

Our website just went up!

It's been over a year since I was approached to get on board this project, and it's nice to see it come to fruitition. It's a site about cars, car buying and driving, etcetera. Some blood, some sweat, some tears, some roasted tires and endless kilometers of test driving. At least we finally have something to show for it. ;)

http://bigbigcar.com

Now all we need are some sponsors.

Wednesday, August 15, 2007

Rain, Rain, Go Away



Two typhoons within spitting distance of each other. No testing. No test-driving. Nuthin. Damn weather.

Monday, August 6, 2007

My right arm for a V-Box

Sorry, no photos with this one...

It's been a slow week for test-drives, so I've been fiddling with a friend's VBox for the past week, and it's disappointing that this supposedly 142 bhp car (++, with my mods) still can't get to 100 km/h in under 8.9 seconds.

I know my driving sucks... but that's not the point... I should be able to get about 8.5 easy. Time for new engine mounts, I suppose... lots of lurch on launch from the soft, cheap replacement parts. But also, it may be time to lower my tire pressures... 35 psi on the street is kind of excessive.

What's interesting is that at 8.9 to 100 km/h and a further 16.1 to 160 km/h, I've matched Car and Driver's 25 second run to 160 km/h. Which means, if I'd gotten the 0-100 km/h right, as per C!'s supposed 8.2 second run, I should be 1.5 seconds faster than stock to 160 km/h. Pathetic... time to sort out my intake again. :)